|
A Narrow Gauge 4-4-0 Part 1 Introduction My original subject was a C&S gondola, but further research revealed that a 4-4-0 would be more appropriate because one was not available. What are Generic Characteristics? How to Find Generic Characteristics Do you want to model narrow gauge in general, California narrow gauge, eastern narrow gauge, European narrow gauge? Whatever you chose, select the largest narrow gauge railroad(s) and consider their equipment as having generic characteristics. I use C&S and D&RGW as primary and then add any other railroads as I can find information on them. Choosing small railroads, where everything is built at random, does not give good generic characteristics. Sometimes the equipment of larger railroads have unique characteristics which label that car as belonging to that railroad. Also watch out for one railroad having rolling stock from another. All you end up with is two sets of the same data. Yes, this is all a bit subjective but as you measure rolling stock or collect plans you'll find most have roughly the same dimensions. What Data to Gather Sources for 4-4-0 For this project I used the following five sources. These were randomly chosen from my 4-4-0 file. "The Colorful Eureka" Model Railroader, Dec 1997, George Sebastian-Coleman "South Pacific Coast Railroad #3" Narrow Gauge and Shortline Gazette, N/D 1998, Robert Schlechter "Ohio River & Western 3-Foot Gauge 4-4-0's - #9 and #10" Narrow Gauge and Shortline Gazette, J/A 1998, Edward H. Cass "Nevada County Narrow Gauge #7 a 3-Foot Gauge 4-4-0" Narrow Gauge and Shortline Gazette, M/A 1997, Ed Gebhardt "Southern Pacific Narrow Gauge Locomotives" Valley Car Works, Sheet #1 Compose Charts The first bits of data I need concern the engine wheel spacing and diameters and the layout of the tender. This is needed in order to look for a mechanism suitable for building the model. The drawings illustrate the dimensions which data has been collected from. I took my five sources and wrote down dimensions. Then I took the highest and lowest and used these as the range. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conclusion The data collected can now be used to look for a suitable mechanism, but a few more dimensions need to be taken. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Narrow Gauge 4-4-0 Part 2 Before a chassis is searched out, more dimensions are collected concerning the next major components, those being the boiler and the tender body. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 4
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conclusion The engine cab has been omitted for now, but it will need to be considered during construction. Now the search for the chassis begins. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Narrow Gauge 4-4-0 Part 3 Using the Data Searching for an HO Mechanism Criteria for The Search 2. HO 4-4-0’s are a possibility, but the driver diameter and spacing will probably be too small. 3. Any engine with the frame extending past the rear driver can be eliminated. This is usually where the electric motor is located and this area would have to be cut off to be useful. This also includes any engine with a rear truck or axle. 4. A 4-6-0 is possible because of no rear overhang, and the front driver may be able to be removed, leaving two drivers at a useable spacing. 5. A 2-6-0 is also possible for the same reasons as in #3. 6. Since HO is not quite one half the size of O, a perfect mechanism will not be found. Any mechanism chose will have more than one area of compromise. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 6 HO Model Engines Considered
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The search reveals three possibilities: The Bachmann Harry Potter 4-6-0, the Tyco/Mantua 4-6-0 and the MDC Roundhouse 2-6-0. After acquiring a Harry Potter engine I eliminated it as a possibility as the cylinder and rods would have to be completely redesigned and built. Now to see how the two chosen HO engine mechanisms compare the protoytypes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 7 HO Engine Comparisons
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results: the Tyco engine comes in overall at about 75% which means that it too small to build a full size narrow gauge engine. Anything built on this chassis as is will be very small and will not hold its own next to a Bachmann 2-6-0. The MDC engine varies greatly overall from 61 to 93% which suggests that the On30 conversion may look odd. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chart 8 Tender Measurements
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||